Column: How to do social TV right

Remember: strong content and the first screen still rule Is it any wonder that social media activity around TV is taking off? Shared experiences make our lives more meaningful. Consumers are always looking for simpler, richer, more meaningful ways to have these shared experiences, especially when it comes to TV, the most ubiquitous content distributor […]

Remember: strong content and the first screen still rule

Is it any wonder that social media activity around TV is taking off?

Shared experiences make our lives more meaningful. Consumers are always looking for simpler, richer, more meaningful ways to have these shared experiences, especially when it comes to TV, the most ubiquitous content distributor in history. And tablets and other connected devices are rapidly giving more consumers new ways to interact.

But why is Twitter so far ahead when it comes to bolstering the experience of watching, talking and sharing about TV?

As All Things D’s Peter Kafka put it when Zeebox came to the U.S., too many social-TV apps are “designed around a business problem — how can we get people to stay with our shows longer or hang out on our service? — instead of consumer problems.” Most social-TV aps are more interested in telling people what they should want than creating compelling experiences. People want meaningful engagements around TV content, not gimmicks meant to coax them into a desired behavior. And it had better be simple.

The biggest reason Twitter has the most of the social-TV market among consumers is that it’s the easiest way to have meaningful shared experiences around TV. Networks, brands and agencies, meanwhile, need data that are relevant to consumers’ core interests, not their threshold for incentive-driven, Pavlovian behavior — such as piling up awards points or stickers by checking on various social TV platforms.

While the market continues to flood with game-like social-TV products, however, real innovations that improve the consumer experience can go unnoticed. The ability to filter “People I Know” from Twitter’s hashtag chaos, for example, greatly improved the co-viewing experience.

There are other interesting innovations in the sector, such as the recent TVGuide.com partnership with Witstream around the Emmys, that are quietly developing approaches that augment first-screen content instead of distracting from it. Yet most of the social-media column inches on the Emmys centered around Tracey Morgan’s sideshow, a stunt that felt designed specifically to game the tune-in and comment numbers.

When networks, agencies and entrepreneurs build experiences that enhance our basic human desire to share meaningful experiences, the social TV experience for consumers will improve. We need to find ways to put authentic social interactions in the experience instead of offering shameless promotions and gimmicks to influence viewer tune-in rates. The best way to keep viewers tuned in to TV programming will always be to make great TV. Strong content and the first-screen experience are still king. What consumers want are better ways to enjoy what they love. It really is that simple.

Jeff Schroer is co-founder of iBubblr.

To read the original story in Advertising Age, click here.

Media Articles

Vantage Point: Apple strives to make mobile wallets work

Plus, U.S. programmatic spend to reach $10 billion

McDonald’s Hope Bagozzi joins IAB Canada board

Marketer joins with Globe's Andrew Saunders and Microsoft's Brandon Grosvenor

Cable companies down, but not out

Cutting the cord won't mean cutting out your cable provider

On the Move — Weekly Roundup

A recap of who’s headed where in Canadian marketing communications

Blue Ant hires Laura Pearce to focus on consumer outreach

Former AOL exec now VP of brand strategy and fan engagement

CBS launches digital streaming service

Service offers expansive lineup, but doesn't include live sporting events

Digital Day 2014: Mitch Joel and Scott Stratten talk real-time

The social media experts discuss social spontaneity and Carrot Top

HBO GO to launch as stand-alone streaming service in 2015

Network sets its sights on the 80 million homes in the U.S. that don't have HBO