StackAdapt publishes native programmatic benchmarks

Native ads see close to three times the engagement display gets

Stackadapt says that, according to its first benchmarking study, programmatically bought native ads are clicked almost three times as often as standard display ads.

The Toronto-based ad tech company has completed 1,500 North American native ad campaigns since it launched its programmatic native buying platform in spring 2014, and has just released new benchmarks on how those campaigns performed.

According to StackAdapt, native ad click-through rates (CTR) across the platform averaged between 0.4% and 0.8%, considerably higher than the benchmark CTR for display (0.14% in Canada and 0.08% in the U.S., according to 2015 numbers from DoubleClick). That’s also higher than benchmarks set by Polar’s non-programmatic native advertising platform MediaVoice of 0.15% for desktop and 0.26% for mobile (though Polar surveyed a much larger dataset of more than a billion impressions globally).

StackAdapt co-founder and COO Vitaly Pecherskiy said one of the main factors behind the improved performance in native is the focus on providing value to the reader through content.

“Instead of just a plain marketing message, like ‘get 20% off’ or ‘sign up now’, it’s branded content that’s value-generating,” he said. “They’re not ‘sell-y,’ they are often really interesting to read, and very educational or entertaining.”

Engagement also tends to be higher in programmatic native (versus non-programmatic native) because advertisers are able to target a high-engagement audience and optimize towards more engagement, he said.

Based on StackAdapt’s post-click metrics, users that click through to native content spend between one-and-a-half and three minutes on the site. That’s similar to average time spent on most kinds of editorial content.

Among the clients StackAdapt works with, CPG advertisers had the best rate of engagement, averaging a 0.52% CTR, followed by style and fashion brands at 0.38% and automotive at 0.35%.

“It all comes down to quality of content,” Pecherskiy said. “It’s really easy to tell a great story for a CPG brand or a travel brand versus, for example, a financial brand or insurance company. Take Dove, they have great content around empowering women and gender equality. For them, it’s really easy to produce content users find inspiring, so they’re just naturally a good fit for content marketing.”

Native (or “in-feed”) ads differ from typical display in that they’re automatically generated to match the design of the website where they’re placed, and usually run in the main editorial content feed rather than in standard ad placements. Studies have generally found that native ads get more clicks than display ads, though detractors argue that’s because they’re easier to mistake for content.

See all comments Recent Comments
Harry Crane

Since when is CTR a measure of engagement, especially in today’s world of click bots? Even if the only measurement of a campaigns success were clicks, the metric to look at in paid media is CPC, not CTR. A high CTR does not always equate to a low CPC. And native offers a quality of content? 90% of native ads are fluff pieces acting as straight click bait. Let’s look at acquisition campaign performance of native vs. display.

Tuesday, November 17 @ 8:32 pm |

Add a comment

You must be to comment.

Create a Commenting Account

Tech Articles

Welcome to the programmatic TV club (column)

Tug Canada's Sean Smith says digital media understands TV's future better than TV does

Chatter: Backlash against Facebook’s video view gaffe

Advertisers were given over-inflated results for two years

IAB adds digital details to LEAN ads program

Industry invited to weigh in on new guidelines for VR, emoji marketing

Does artificial intelligence have a place in PR? (Column)

As the media landscape continues to collapse, will AI be its saviour?

NHL’s Bill Daly explains use of virtual ads on rink boards

Deputy commissioner discusses sponsorship innovation at MES 2016

Ad Block Digest: Major coalition seeks new global ad standards

Adblock Plus faces challenges as users rebel and the industry unites against it

Brainjuicer launches System1 digital ad testing service

Testing "fame, feeling and fluency" in online display and video